Loading
WSU Lexicon: Corporate Issuers
Net present value is the sum of a project's expected cash flows discounted at the required rate of return, minus the initial investment. A positive NPV means the project is expected to add value to the firm, so it should be accepted under the NPV rule.
NPV is the discounted-cash-flow benchmark against which IRR and payback period are judged.
The entry
NPV is only as good as the cash flow stream fed into it. The inputs are incremental, after-tax operating cash flows: revenue less cash costs less taxes, with depreciation added back because it is a non-cash charge that matters only through its tax shield. Changes in net working capital are outflows when working capital builds and inflows when it is released, typically at project end. Terminal-year items include after-tax salvage proceeds. Sunk costs are excluded, opportunity costs of assets already owned are included at market value, and financing costs are excluded because they are captured in the discount rate.
Each year's cash flow is divided by one plus the required return raised to the power of the number of periods, the discounted amounts are summed, and the initial outlay is subtracted. The result is expressed in today's currency units and represents value created for existing owners.
The entry
NPV measures value in currency terms rather than as a rate, which makes it consistent with the objective of maximising shareholder wealth. Two properties matter. First, value additivity: the NPV of a set of independent projects equals the sum of their individual NPVs, so a firm can evaluate a capital budget project by project without distortion. Percentage measures such as IRR do not add up this way.
Second, NPV embeds the correct opportunity cost. Cash flows are discounted at the return available on alternatives of equal risk, so a positive NPV means the project beats what capital markets offer for that risk class. IRR, by contrast, solves for the rate that sets NPV to zero and can produce multiple solutions when cash flow signs alternate, no solution in some cases, and misleading rankings when projects differ in scale or in the timing of cash flows.
The entry
In corporate practice NPV underpins capital expenditure approval, bid pricing for concessions and licences, lease-versus-buy analysis, and the evaluation of acquisitions, where the purchase price plays the role of the initial outlay and projected free cash flows plus a terminal value form the inflows. Discounted cash flow equity valuation is the same arithmetic applied to an entire firm.
The concept also appears in reporting. Impairment testing compares carrying amounts with recoverable amounts built from discounted cash flows, so a collapse in expected prices or a rise in required returns can force write-downs on assets that were approved when NPV was positive. In efficient markets, announcement of a clearly positive-NPV investment should be reflected in the share price, which is why management commentary on project economics and hurdle rates attracts analyst attention.
The entry
Expect to compute NPV on a financial calculator using the cash flow register, entering the outlay as a negative period-zero figure and the remaining flows in order, then solving with the required return. Be able to state the accept-reject rule for an independent project and the highest-NPV rule for mutually exclusive projects, and to explain why the two can diverge from IRR rankings because of scale and cash flow timing, with the crossover rate marking where the NPV profiles intersect.
Also practise reading an NPV profile, identifying the vertical intercept as the undiscounted sum of cash flows and the horizontal intercept as the IRR. Recognise adjustments for unequal project lives, for capital rationing, and for real versus nominal treatment: real cash flows must be paired with a real discount rate, nominal with nominal.
Common trap
NPV should prevail. IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR itself and can mislead when projects differ in scale or timing, or when cash flows change sign more than once. NPV measures value added in currency terms and is additive across projects.
In practice
Large energy producers discount long-dated field developments at their cost of capital. When crude prices collapsed in 2014–2016, expected revenues fell and many projects flipped to negative NPV, triggering the well-documented wave of capital-spending cuts and deferrals.
Candidates ask
See also
One entry from the WSU Lexicon every day. Browse the full archive.